• Bagikan:
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

Text  

Peran Kemitraan Komprehensif Strategis Antara Republik Rakyat Tiongkok Dan Republik Indonesia Dalam Perimbangan Kekuatan Antara Indonesia Dan malaysia

---

• Ketersediaan
• Informasi Detil
• Deskripsi
• Versi lain/terkait
• Komentar

• Code	CallNo	Lokasi	Ketersediaan
  D4536	D4536	Perpustakaan Sekolah Pascasarjana	Tersedia

• Perpustakaan	Sekolah Pascasarjana
  Judul Seri	-
  No. Panggil	D4536
  Penerbit	: Bandung., 2017
  Deskripsi Fisik	-
  Bahasa	Indonesia
  ISBN/ISSN	-
  Klasifikasi	NONE
  Tipe Isi	-
  Tipe Media	-
  Tipe Pembawa	-
  Edisi	-
  Subyek	Republik Rakyat Tiongkok Republik Indonesia
  Info Detil Spesifik	-
  Pernyataan Tanggungjawab	-

• Penelitian disertasi ini ditujukan untuk menemukan solusi yang lebih tepat bagi negara lemah Non Blok dalam menghadapi aliansi lawan yang lebih kuat. Teori Perimbangan Kekuatan saat ini dari Morgenthau, Waltz dan Walt hanya menawarkan solusi bargaining dan badwagoning – yang keduanya kurang memuaskan negara lemah Non Blok. Sementara Kuik menawarkan solusi hedging yang pada situasi mendesak tetap mengarahkan terbentuknya aliansi. Penelitian ini mengkaji konsep perimbangan kekuatan melalui metode penelitian kualitatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data berupa studi kepustakaan, wawancara, serta studi kasus dalam kerangka berpikir induktif. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa kemitraan strategis dapat dijadikan instrumen perimbangan kekuatan bagi negara Non Blok dalam menghadapi aliansi yang lebih kuat. Peneliti menawarkan gagasan jalan tengah – sebagai opsi keempat – yang disebut dengan bargaining. Dalam bargaining, suatu negara memanfaatkan bentuk kemitraan strategisnya dengan sejumlah kekuatan besar sedemikian rupa hingga dapat melemahkan kredibilitas aliansi yang mendukung negara rivalnya. Untuk menjelaskan gagasan itu, disajikan studi kasus rivalitas Indonesia dan Malaysia dalam penguasaan Blok Laut Ambalat. Malaysia yang tergabung dalam aliansi Five Powers Defense Arrangement (FPDA) telah menyebabkan kekuatannya superior dari Indonesia. Indonesia dengan politik bebas aktif-nya tidak mungkin beraliansi dengan kekuatan lain untuk mengimbangi FPDA. Namun Indonesia telah menjalin kemitraan strategis dengan Tiongkok, Amerika Serikat dan Australia yang dapat dimanfaatkan sebagai kontra-aliansi. Kata kunci: Perimbangan Kekuatan, Aliansi, Non Blok, Kemitraan Strategis, Bargaining iv ABSTRACT This dissertation is devoted to finding more appropriate solution for the weaker Non-Aligned states in the face of stronger alliances threat. Today’s Balancing of Power theory from Morgenthau, Waltz and Walt only offer badwagoning and bargaining solutions - both of which are unsatisfactory for weaker non-aligned states. While Kuik offers hedging solution in which on urgent situations still directs to the formation of the alliance. This study examines the concept of balance of power through qualitative research methods with data collection technique of literature studies, interviews, and case study within the framework of inductive thinking. The results of this study concluded that strategic partnerships can be used as instrument of balance of power for the weaker Non-Aligned states in the face of stronger alliances. Author offers middle way solution - as a fourth option - the socalled bargaining. In bargaining, a state takes advantage of its strategic partnerships with a number of great powers such a way that could undermine the credibility of the alliance that supports rival state(sw). To explain the idea, this dissertation presents a case study of rivalry between Indonesia and Malaysia in the control Ambalat Sea Block. Malaysia with its Five Powers Defense Arrangement (FPDA) alliance has caused its strength superior than Indonesia. Indonesia with its free and active politics is not possible to build alliance with other forces to compensate FPDA. However, Indonesia has strategic partnerships with China, the United States and Australia, which can be used as a counteralliance. Keywords: Balance of Power, Alliance, Non aligned, Strategic Partnerships, Bargaining ABSTRACT This dissertation is devoted to finding more appropriate solution for the weaker Non-Aligned states in the face of stronger alliances threat. Today’s Balancing of Power theory from Morgenthau, Waltz and Walt only offer badwagoning and bargaining solutions - both of which are unsatisfactory for weaker non-aligned states. While Kuik offers hedging solution in which on urgent situations still directs to the formation of the alliance. This study examines the concept of balance of power through qualitative research methods with data collection technique of literature studies, interviews, and case study within the framework of inductive thinking. The results of this study concluded that strategic partnerships can be used as instrument of balance of power for the weaker Non-Aligned states in the face of stronger alliances. Author offers middle way solution - as a fourth option - the socalled bargaining. In bargaining, a state takes advantage of its strategic partnerships with a number of great powers such a way that could undermine the credibility of the alliance that supports rival state(sw). To explain the idea, this dissertation presents a case study of rivalry between Indonesia and Malaysia in the control Ambalat Sea Block. Malaysia with its Five Powers Defense Arrangement (FPDA) alliance has caused its strength superior than Indonesia. Indonesia with its free and active politics is not possible to build alliance with other forces to compensate FPDA. However, Indonesia has strategic partnerships with China, the United States and Australia, which can be used as a counteralliance. Keywords: Balance of Power, Alliance, Non aligned, Strategic Partnerships, Barg

• Tidak tersedia versi lain

• Silakan login dahulu untuk melihat atau memberi komentar.