Detail Cantuman

Image of Formulasi kebijakan anggaran pendapatan dan belanja negara (studi kebijakan umum anggaran kota Pontianak tahun 2011)

 

Formulasi kebijakan anggaran pendapatan dan belanja negara (studi kebijakan umum anggaran kota Pontianak tahun 2011)


Dissertation research 'examines the Yearly Budget Policy Formulation of
Pontianak City (Study on General Policy of Pontianak City 2011 Yearly ...

  • CodeCallNoLokasiKetersediaan
    01001120100223351 Ngu f/R.17.343Perpustakaan Pusat (REF.17.343)Tersedia namun tidak untuk dipinjamkan - Missing
  • Perpustakaan
    Perpustakaan Pusat
    Judul Seri
    -
    No. Panggil
    351 Ngu f/R.17.343
    Penerbit Program Pascasarjana Unpad : Bandung.,
    Deskripsi Fisik
    xviii,;176 hlm,;29 cm
    Bahasa
    Indonesia
    ISBN/ISSN
    -
    Klasifikasi
    351 Ngu f
    Tipe Isi
    -
    Tipe Media
    -
    Tipe Pembawa
    -
    Edisi
    -
    Subyek
    Info Detil Spesifik
    -
    Pernyataan Tanggungjawab
  • Dissertation research 'examines the Yearly Budget Policy Formulation of
    Pontianak City (Study on General Policy of Pontianak City 2011 Yearly Budget).
    The research focuses on interaction between the budget team of city government
    and budget department of Pontianak city Local Legislative Board (DPRD) related
    to the formulation of General Budget Policy (Kebijakan Umum Anggaran / KUA)
    The formulated research question: "Why the general policy on Pontianak City
    budget is late? The research design used by the researcher is qualitative method

    The research shows that the lateness is because of lack of responsiveness,
    commitment, and consistency of the city budgetary team and budgetary
    department of DP RD. Lack of responsibility is clarly shown from the fact that the
    KUA draft from the City Government and DP RD Budgetary Department is always
    late. The lateness is intentional in order to gain material and non-material
    benefits for the persons involved directly, his/her family members, constituents,
    colleagues, or friends .. Lack of responsiveness can be seen from the fact that they
    decreased the projection of the city local income as they also decrease social
    funds for public. On the other hand, the portion offundfor DPRD and Silpa 2011
    projection are increased As for the. lack of responsiveness from the DPRD
    members, we can see that from the fact that they keep on increasing the fund
    dedicated for themselves, such as; housingfund, and communication budget. Lack
    of commitment and consistency are seen from the differences between the words
    came out of their mouth and the action did by them. In addition they have low
    attendance level on meetings discussing the formulation of KUA. As for the
    actions that indicate their lack of commitment and consistency, it can be seen
    from their disobedience toward the schedule determined earlier for the discussion
    of KUA. They also break the promises they made when they were elected. Another
    indicator is the fact that they make the meetings discussing about KUA unable to
    be accessed by outsider, while the law clearly state that the meetings should be
    open for public.
  • Tidak tersedia versi lain

  • Silakan login dahulu untuk melihat atau memberi komentar.


Informasi