Detail Cantuman

No image available for this title

Skripsi  

STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENINJAUAN KEMBALI NOMOR 140/PK/Pdt/2015 MENGENAI PENGELOLAAN KEKAYAAN YAYASAN SUPERSEMAR


Foundation is a form of legal entity that aims at non profit but rather as a container for activities of a nature and aims social, religious, and ...

  • CodeCallNoLokasiKetersediaan
    274274/2017Perpustakaan Mochtar Kusumaatmadja FH UnpadTersedia
  • Perpustakaan
    Fakultas Hukum
    Judul Seri
    -
    No. Panggil
    274/2017
    Penerbit Fakultas Hukum UNPAD : Bandung.,
    Deskripsi Fisik
    xi, 78 hal, 30 cm.
    Bahasa
    Indonesia
    ISBN/ISSN
    -
    Klasifikasi
    NONE
    Tipe Isi
    -
    Tipe Media
    -
    Tipe Pembawa
    -
    Edisi
    -
    Subyek
    Info Detil Spesifik
    -
    Pernyataan Tanggungjawab
  • Foundation is a form of legal entity that aims at non profit but rather as a container for activities of a nature and aims social, religious, and humanity . Supersemar Foundation is a foundation that works in the field of education by channeling education funding for students who have difficulty in terms of financing education. In carrying out its objectives Supersemar Foundation gets grant funds from the state through Government Regulation No. 15 of 1976. Supersemar Foundation is argued by the state that it has committed acts against the law because it has used the funds obtained from the state by not in accordance with the purpose of the foundation by lending and depositing funds on some companies.
    The purpose of this case study was to find out whether the lending and deposit of funds done by the Supersemar Foundation was unlawful and to know the legal basis of the obligation in returning the funding to the state as it was provided by the Supersemar Foundation.
    The writing of this case study was based on the normative juridical approach method, which limited the scope of problem solving based on the provisions in legislation, academic literature, and other related materials. Based on the research conducted, the results obtained: Firstly, the element of loss in the act against the law must be fully met or could be proven by the argumentation. Secondly, quad non Supersemar Foundation's committed an unlawful act and was terminated in order of compensation, the judges should consider the returning the funds to the Supersemar Foundation or deciding to disolve the Supersemar
  • Tidak tersedia versi lain

  • Silakan login dahulu untuk melihat atau memberi komentar.


Informasi