• Bagikan:
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

Manuscript  

Overview of maxillary and mandibular intercanine distance in males and females as gender identification method from bite mark: a rapid review and meta-analysis

---

• Ketersediaan
• Informasi Detil
• Deskripsi
• Versi lain/terkait
• Komentar

• Code	CallNo	Lokasi	Ketersediaan
  OB1 - 197	197 611 Put O	Jatinangor (Oral Biologi)	Tersedia namun tidak untuk dipinjamkan - No Loan

• Perpustakaan	Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi
  Judul Seri	-
  No. Panggil	611 Put O
  Penerbit	FKG Unpad : FKG UNPAD JATINANGOR., 2022
  Deskripsi Fisik	-
  Bahasa	English
  ISBN/ISSN	160110180093
  Klasifikasi	611
  Tipe Isi	-
  Tipe Media	-
  Tipe Pembawa	-
  Edisi	-
  Subyek	forensic odontology Intercanine distance Bite mark gender identification
  Info Detil Spesifik	-
  Pernyataan Tanggungjawab	Yuda Haditia Putra (Author)

• Introduction: The presence of physical evidence such as bite marks in criminal cases will be very valuable, because if properly analyzed, bite marks can prove someone's involvement in a crime. Bite marks have a picture of dental anatomy that is very characteristic and unique of each individual. Therefore, through analysis of bite mark evidence, a lot of information can be obtained, one of which is gender. Gender identification of bite marks can be done through several methods such as intercanine distance measurement. This study aims to examine how the comparison of the maxillary and mandibular intercanine distances between male and female can be used to identify gender from bite mark. Methods: The search for articles refers to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method conducted through PubMed, EBSCohost, ScienceDirect, and SAGE Journals published in 2011-2021. Articles are screened and assessed for eligibility. The data obtained were processed using independent sample t-test to obtain p-value. Results: A total of 7 articles fit all the criteria and obtained 10 different samples. Seven samples showed that the maxillary intercanine distance had a more significant p-value between male and female, 1 sample showed that the mandibular intercanine distance had a more significant p-value between male and female, while the other 2 samples showed an equally significance value between male and female on the maxilla and mandible. Conclusion: Maxillary intercanine distance showed greater dimorphism than the mandibular intercanine distance in its use to identify gender from the bite mark. Keywords: Forensic odontology, intercanine distance, gender identification, bite mark

• Tidak tersedia versi lain

• Silakan login dahulu untuk melihat atau memberi komentar.